International Cooperation, 80 years on from 1945

As we approach another major anniversary of the end of the Second World War (VE80), the international institutions built to prevent such a cataclysmic conflict reoccurring have never seemed so challenged. Amidst the anxiety about where we are headed, politically and diplomatically, it is essential that we communicate the successes of cooperation and sustainable security. Joana Frew summarises some of the critiques of the post-1945 order and begins to look at successes achieved since then. RS will be sharing more such stories of cooperation, success and progress in developing sustainable security in a webinar on 21 May and a series of Blog articles over this year.  

Does the new Government’s Strategic Defence Review offer a window for rethinking UK defence policy?

On 13 September 2024, the British International Studies Association’s new Security Policy and Practice working group hosted a ‘Dialogue on the UK Government’s Strategic Defence Review’, supported by Rethinking Security. Over 50 scholars, plus experts working with parliamentary committees, NGOs and think tanks, joined the session. This article captures key points from the discussion while respecting the Chatham House Rule.

Fight Tonight, Blight Tomorrow: NATO consolidates amidst climate breakdown

Two of the many consequences of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have been the release of vast amounts of climate-damaging carbon and the reconsolidation of the NATO alliance. Ian Davis reflects on two recent reports that illustrate how the world’s revived obsession with military ‘deterrence’ and protracted war heightens the risk of more than one type of existential catastrophe.

Covert Counter Terror Policing in Health and Social Care

A new report from Medact and the University of Warwick reveals the extent of new non-traditional methods of surveillance and counter-terror policing in health, education and social care. The Counter Terrorism Clinical Consultancy Service (CT CCS) raises serious ethical questions for potentially vulnerable members of society, their rights and agency – fundamental components of human security. Report author Charlotte Heath-Kelly outlines how the CT CCS came about, how it works and the ethical issues it raises.

How does the UK public define its own security?

How the British people understand their own security is a question that ought to be central to security policy analysis. Yet public opinion polling on security issues almost always seeks to gauge reaction to and validation of a small range of established security threats and responses. New research by Rethinking Security and Coventry University sought to let people define their own security and how it relates to the UK state and society. The responses were startling.